State v. Marchand’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 422 So. 2d 123 - State v. Graham (1982), 445 So. 2d 1171 - State v. Williams (1984)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Remmer v. United States · Turner v. Louisiana · Sanitary District v. Cullerton · State v. Kifer · State v. . Brittain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] constitutional due process right of fair trial by jury, even, may be violated, if the trial jurors are subjected to influences through the attending bailiffs of the state which may cause their verdict to be influenced by circumstances other than the evidence developed at the trial. Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466 , 85 S.Ct. 546 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1964)[(1965)].”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“except that a juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the juror's attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Baker · State v. Sheehan“No juror, grand or petit, is competent to testify to his own or his fellows' misconduct, or to give evidence to explain, qualify or impeach any indictment or any verdict found by the body of which he is or was a member; but every juror, grand or petit, is a competent witness to rebut any attack upon the regularity of the conduct or of the findings of the body of which he is or was a member.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.