Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 SO2D 1358 - State v. Henderson

State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Hudson v. Louisiana (1981), 410 So. 2d 1019 - State v. Willie (1982)

65 state decisions

29019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Agurs · 356 So. 2d 1370 - State v. Martin · 339 So. 2d 764 - State v. May · State v. Harvey · 285 So. 2d 240 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There must be an occurrence or event sufficiently startling to render normal reflective thought processes of an observer inoperative. Additionally, the statement of the declarant must have been a spontaneous reaction to the occurrence or event and not the result of reflective thought.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The state and the defendant shall have the right before argument to submit to the court special written charges for the jury. Such charges may be received by the court in its discretion after argument has begun. The party submitting the charges shall furnish a copy of the charges to the other party when the charges are submitted to the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(2) It is the duty of the jury, in considering the evidence and in applying to that evidence the law as given by the court, to give the defendant the benefit of every reasonable doubt arising out of the evidence or out of the lack of evidence in the case ..."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.