Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 SO2D 1371 - State v. Burge

State v. Burge’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2014

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

15019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coker v. Georgia · Filmon v. Florida · 359 So. 2d 586 - State in Interest of Dino · 354 So. 2d 186 - State v. Hills · 340 So. 2d 180 - State v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Dino guidelines dealt specifically with the police interrogation of a juvenile. Here, however, the police were not interrogating Morrow. The police had arrested him and had advised him of his Miranda rights. He was immediately placed in the police car, and there he made an entirely unsolicited, inculpatory statement that he had participated in the rape and kidnapping. "All three officers present at the time Morrow made his statement testified emphatically that he had not been questioned, threatened, or abused. * * * * * * "Both of Morrow's statements were unsolicited; therefore, our Dino rules relating to the interrogation of a juvenile are inapplicable. The trial court, therefore, properly denied defendants' motion to quash those two statements."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The fact of an intoxicated or drugged condition of the offender at the time of the commission of the crime is immaterial, except as follows: * * * * * * “(2) Where the circumstances indicate that an intoxicated or drugged condition has precluded the presence of a specific criminal intent or of specific knowledge required in a particular crime, this fact constitutes a defense to a prosecution for that crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he two then forced the woman into the passenger side of the vehicle and drove her to a deserted area, where she was beaten and raped”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.