Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 SO2D 198 - Lias v. State

Lias v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2010

16 state decisions

12019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gambrell v. State · 354 So. 2d 266 - Williams v. State · Myrick v. State · 245 So. 2d 583 - Smith v. State · Kearney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While admitting the closeness of the factual determination, we also acknowledge that such determination is the purpose for which juries exist. We are unwilling on an appeal to overturn a jury determination unless such determination is unsupported by the facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.