362 So. 2d 29 - Cuba v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 1985
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. United States · Marron v. United States · Stanford v. Texas · United States v. Kahn · Connally v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inform the issuing judge of the difficulties involved in the use of conventional techniques. (citations omitted) It is common knowledge ... that conventional investigative techniques generally are insufficient for adequate and successful prosecutorial termination of such criminal lottery activities.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lane · Wilson v. State“the public, upon which the expense of the investigation ultimately is imposed, is the aggrieved party in this circumstance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ballance v. State“contained new and material facts developed by further investigation ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.