¶1Defendant seeks review of the denial without evidentiary hearing of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence. Defendant’s assertion that consecutive sentences imposed for the burglary and grand larceny were illegal since the offenses arose out of a single transaction is, as determined by the trial court, without merit. Estevez v. State, 313 So.2d 692 (Fla.1975); Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 477 (Fla.1975); State v. Kirkland, 322 So.2d 480 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the order denying defendant’s motion to vacate is AFFIRMED.
362 So. 2d 433
Thomas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 31, 1978
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-08-31
Relies on 313 So. 2d 692 - Estevez v. State · 322 So. 2d 477 - Jenkins v. Wainwright · State v. Kirkland
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1978-08-31
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2007
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →