¶1Appellant was convicted for the offenses of burglary and attempted grand larceny. The convictions are affirmed. However, the judgment and sentence form, although adjudicating appellant guilty of each offense, fails to reflect a pronouncement of sentence for the offense of attempted grand larceny. This is improper. Helton v. State, 106 So.2d 79 (Fla.1958); Bateh v. State, 101 So.2d 869 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1958), cert. disch. 110 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959); Slay v. State, 347 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1977). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for the imposition of a proper sentence.
362 So. 2d 478
Shirmon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 21, 1978
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-09-21
Relies on 110 So. 2d 7 - State v. Bateh · 101 So. 2d 869 - Bateh v. State · 106 So. 2d 79 - Helton v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1978-09-21
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1994
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →