¶1We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1977), requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Knight v. State, supra.Therefore, we remand the case for correction of the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.
362 So. 2d 719
Brooker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 27, 1978
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-09-27
Relies on Division of Family Services v. In the Interest of M. V. W.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1978-09-27
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably Cook v. Deltona Corp. (1985), Cavic v. Grand Bahama Development Co. (1983)
7 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →