Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 SW2D 322 - Henderson v. State

Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1977
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 121 Tex. Crim. 616 - Musick v. State · 172 Tex. Crim. 570 - Benedict v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 383 - McCann v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person while legally in a retail business establishment as an invitee or licensee who removes from its place, goods, edible meat or other corporeal personal property of any kind or character kept, stored or displayed for sale with the intent to fraudulently take and to deprive the owner of the value of the same and to appropriate the same to the use and benefit of the person taking is guilty of shoplifting. Altering of label or marking on goods, edible meat or other corporeal personal property or transferring same from one container to another with intent to defraud the owner also constitutes the crime of shoplifting.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Section 1. Any person while legally in a retail business establishment as an invitee or licensee who removes from its place, goods, edible meat or other corporeal personal property of any kind or character * * (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.