¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
¶2My brethren overrule appellant’s motion for rehearing without written opinion.
¶3In view of the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States (June, 1962) in Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139, 82 S.Ct. 1218, 8 L.Ed.2d 384, the writer deems it wise to observe that appellant was not present in the rooms of the other roomers at the time such rooms were searched and the officer testified that he secured the consent of such roomers before a search was conducted.