Montgomery v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This may be shown by a continued or persistent course of conduct evidencing an entire want of care resulting from a realization of danger to the rights of others and a conscious indifference to such rights, safety and welfare of the persons affected. Bernal v. Seitt, 158 Tex. 521 , 313 S.W.2d 520 ; Burt v. Lochausen, 151 Tex. 289 , 249 S.W.2d 194 ; Bowman v. Puckett, 144 Tex. 125 , 188 S.W.2d 571 . It may also be established by evidence of an act of such quality or kind of conduct as to show that the driver was consciously indifferent to the rights or welfare of his passenger as well as others. Fancher v. Cadwell, 159 Tex. 8 , 314 S.W.2d 820 ; Adams v. McHam, Tex. Civ.App., 310 S.W.2d 145 , ref. n. r. e.” Montgomery v. Campbell, 362 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.Civ.App., 1962, writ ref. n. r. e.).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Barrington v. Adams