Ex Parte Droppleman’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 156 Tex. Crim. 231 - Ex Parte King · 160 Tex. Crim. 483 - Ex Parte Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Ex parte Stewart, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 483 , 271 S.W.2d 945 , a collateral attack upon a judgment on a plea of guilty, we held that the indictment might be looked to in construing the judgment and sentence. See also Ex parte King, 156 Tex. Cr.R. 231, 240 S.W.2d 777 .” (Emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.