Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

362 S.W.3d 481

State v. Sneed

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-03-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*482 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Bradley Sneed (Defendant) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County following his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by failing to hold a hearing on Defendant’s allegation of jury misconduct and overruling his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/362/sw3d/481 · .json · Public domain