¶1 ORDER
¶2 Timothy H. Garnett appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).