Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

362 S.W.3d 508

Speer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-03-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Ernest Speer appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 1 (Rule 29.15 motion or post-conviction motion). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

¶3 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

/362/sw3d/508 · .json · Public domain