¶1 Order
¶2 Linda Noble appeals from a judgment dissolving her marriage to Richard Noble. On appeal, she contends that the trial court erred: by rejecting her claim that Richard Noble improperly squandered a marital interest in a real-estate partnership; in valuing a closely held business based on a liquidation scenario; and in denying her maintenance. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).