MacKey v. Mendoza-Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2018 · most notably Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez (1963), V Subversive Activities Control Board (1961)
27 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1252 · 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Trop v. Dulles · Emich Motors Corporation v. General Motors Corporation · Packet Company v. Sickles · Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States · Dandridge v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to put in issue the question of collateral estoppel and to obtain an adjudication upon it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.