Local Lodge No 1424 v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
712 federal appellate · 34 district · 59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 1,074 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably Townsend v. Sain (1963), DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (1983)
712 federal appellate · 34 district · 59 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedMoore v. Fleishman (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · Grunewald v. United States · Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations Board · Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute
Cited together with Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board · Vaca v. Sipes · National Labor Relations Board v. Katz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,074 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“earlier events may be utilized to shed light on the true character of matters occurring within the limitations period”
56 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]o complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board.”
29 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It may be conceded that the continued enforcement, as well as the execution, of this collective bargaining agreement constitutes an unfair labor practice, and that these are two logically separate violations, independent in the sense that they can be described in discrete terms. Nevertheless, the vice in the enforcement of this agreement is manifestly not independent of the legality of its execution, as would be the case, for example, with an agreement invalid on its face or with one validly executed, but unlawfully administered.”
28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.