Wyatt v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
111 federal appellate · 11 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 178 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably Trammel v. United States (1980), United States v. Edwards (1974)
111 federal appellate · 11 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedWyatt v. United States (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Funk v. United States · Hawkins v. United States · LundBerg v. Bannan · John Stein v. William Bowman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the legislative history discloses, the [Mann] Act reflects the supposition that the women with whom it sought to deal often had no independent will of their own, and embodies, in effect, the view that they must be protected against themselves.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“"Applying the legislative judgment underlying the Act, we are led to hold it not an allowable choice for a prostituted witness-wife `voluntarily' to decide to protect her husband by declining to testify against him." Id. at 530 , 80 S.Ct. at 905 (Mr. Justice Harlan for the majority).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“"That this decision is uniquely legislative and not judicial is demonstrated by the fact that, both in England and in this country, changes in the common-law privilege have been wrought primarily by legislatures." Id. at 535 , 80 S.Ct. at 907 (dissenting opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Warren) (footnote omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Doe v. Norton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.