Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 U.S. 525 - Wyatt v. United States

Wyatt v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

178
cited by 178 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

111 federal appellate · 11 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 178 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably Trammel v. United States (1980), United States v. Edwards (1974)

111 federal appellate · 11 district · 22 state decisions

5601960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWyatt v. United States (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Funk v. United States · Hawkins v. United States · LundBerg v. Bannan · John Stein v. William Bowman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the legislative history discloses, the [Mann] Act reflects the supposition that the women with whom it sought to deal often had no independent will of their own, and embodies, in effect, the view that they must be protected against themselves.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “"Applying the legislative judgment underlying the Act, we are led to hold it not an allowable choice for a prostituted witness-wife `voluntarily' to decide to protect her husband by declining to testify against him." Id. at 530 , 80 S.Ct. at 905 (Mr. Justice Harlan for the majority).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “"That this decision is uniquely legislative and not judicial is demonstrated by the fact that, both in England and in this country, changes in the common-law privilege have been wrought primarily by legislatures." Id. at 535 , 80 S.Ct. at 907 (dissenting opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Warren) (footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.