362 Wis. 2d 370 - State v. Andre M. Chamblis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he concern of due process is fundamental fairness. '[D]ue process is flexible and calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Timothy L. Finley, Jr. · State v. Glenn T. Zamzow

2. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. David Gutierrez

3. “[b]ecause a seventh offense carries a greater range of punishment than does a sixth offense, the court of appeals' remedy renders [the defendant's] plea unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Timothy L. Finley, Jr.