Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 Ark. 295 - MacKool v. State

MacKool v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gaines v. State · Wright v. State · Rainey v. State · Doss v. State · Huddleston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may consist of anger or sudden resentment, or of fear or terror; but the passion springing from any of these causes will not alone reduce the grade of the homicide. There must also be a provocation which induced the passion, and which the law deems adequate to make the passion irresistible. An assault with violence upon another who acts under the influence thereof may be sufficient to arouse such passion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “previously declined to recognize provocation by a third party as sufficient to require instructions on manslaughter” and holding that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.