Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

363 Ark. 306

213 S.W.3d 645

Nelson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 22, 2005

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 2005-09-22

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2014

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“because appellant’s petition was not properly verified. Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1(d) requires that the petition be verified. The verification requirement for a postconviction relief petition is of substantive importance to prevent perjury. Carey v. State, 268 Ark. 332 , 596 S.W.2d 688 (1980). To serve this purpose, a petitioner must execute the verification, and if the petitioner is represented by counsel, counsel may not sign and verify the petition for him. Boyle v. State, 362 Ark. 248 , 208 S.W.3d 134 , [sic] (2005) (per curiam).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Nelson v. Norris

Relies on Carey v. State · Boyle v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-09-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In a bench trial, Stanley Isaac Nelson was found guilty of one count of unlawful discharge of a firearm and sentenced to 360 months’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Nelson appealed and the court of appeals affirmed in an unpublished decision. Nelson v. State, CACR 02-867 (Ark. App. May 7, 2003). Nelson filed a timely petition for postconviction relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1. The trial court held a hearing on the petition and subsequently denied the petition by written order entered December 23, 2003. Nelson now brings this appeal of that order.

¶2 We do not reach the merits of appellant’s arguments on appeal because appellant’s petition was not properly verified. Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1(d) requires that the petition be verified. The verification requirement for a postconviction relief petition is of substantive importance to prevent perjury. Carey v. State, 268 Ark. 332, 596 S.W.2d 688 (1980). To serve this purpose, a petitioner must execute the verification, and if the petitioner is represented by counsel, counsel may not sign and verify the petition for him. Boyle v. State, 362 Ark. 248, 208 S.W.3d 134 (2005) (per curiam).

¶3 Since the petition was not verified as required by Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1(d), dismissal of the petition was appropriate.

¶4 Dismissed.

/363/ark/306 · .json · Public domain