Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baughman v. State · Sullinger v. State · Huddleston v. State · Sanders v. State · Parker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An admonishment is an acknowledged means of curing error. [Sullinger v. State, 310 Ark. 690 , 840 S.W.2d 797 (1992).] In Sullinger defense counsel moved for a mistrial when objectionable questions were asked of a witness. After completion of the testimony, the judge asked the defense attorney if he wanted the jury admonished. He answered yes, and again moved for a mistrial. The judge first admonished the jury and | mdenied the motion. On appeal the court said ... that even though defense counsel renewed his motion for a mistrial after accepting the admonishment, “he could not have it both ways.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Hopper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.