In Re Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “fair notice of the conduct, transaction, and occurrences that form the basis of the claim.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Thornburg · Kolb v. Bentley (In re Bentley)

2. “invoices, itemized statements of running accounts, [and/or] contracts.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Thornburg · Kolb v. Bentley (In re Bentley)

3. “[T]he objecting party [must]...produce evidence at least equal in probative force to that offered by the proof of claim and which, if believed, would refute at least one of the allegations that is essential to the claim's legal sufficiency. This can be done by the objecting party producing specific and detailed allegations that place the claim into dispute, by the presentation of legal arguments based upon the contents of the claim and its supporting documents ... in which evidence is presented to bring the validity of the claim into question. If the objecting party meets these evidentiary requirements, then the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts back to the claimant to sustain its ultimate burden of persuasion to establish the validity and amount of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence. 15”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Thornburg