Zelotes v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 526 (§ 227 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 707
Relies on Califano v. Yamasaki · Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox · United States v. Wells · Gentile v. State Bar of Nev. · Shrader v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because § 526(a)(4) is not sufficiently ‘narrowly tailored to achieve the desired objective,’ it is unconstitutional as applied to bankruptcy at torneys.''); In re Reyes, 361 B.R. at 279 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.