In Re Franks’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Anderson v. Dunn · Pertuso v. Ford Motor Credit Co. · Randolph v. IMBS, Inc. · In Re Perviz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the knowledge requirement to be satisfied, the violating party must possess 'actual knowledge' of the court order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.