Dr. Bertrand O. Tyson v. Lt. Clarence J. Cazes’s Empirical Analysis
363 F.2d 742 · 1966
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1987 · most notably Troy State University v. Dickey (1968), Chilivis v. Securities & Exchange Commission (1982)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · United States v. Ohio Power Co. · Bell v. State of Maryland · Nowak v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is a well settled principle of law that cessation of illegal conduct at the prompting of legal proceedings is not sufficient to render a case moot.” Tyson v. Cazes, 363 F.2d 742 (5th Cir. 1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.