Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 F.2d 986 - Jones v. Pledger

Jones v. Pledger’s Empirical Analysis

363 F.2d 986 · 1966

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
February 1987
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 1987

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

90196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Thompson · Kaczorowski v. Kalkosinski · Welch v. Davis · Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I heartily support the interspousal immunity doctrine in respect to torts, but, where the couple had a limited decree of divorce and the tort was the murder of the wife by the husband coupled with his own suicide, the doctrine has no factual substance upon which to rest, and I see no reason to give effectiveness to its fiction. Especially is this so in an action brought on behalf of a minor child of the marriage against the estate of the parent who destroyed his sole support and security.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The reasons for the immunity have completely disappeared and it should be given no effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.