Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 F.3d 1048 - Beaver v. Clingman

Beaver v. Clingman’s Empirical Analysis

363 F.3d 1048 · 2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
November 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Buckley v. Valeo · Elrod v. Burns · Salve Regina College v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “broad power to prescribe the `Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives,' Art. I, §4, cl. 1, which power is matched by state control over the election process for state offices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “preserving the political parties as viable and identifiable interest groups, [and] insuring that the results of a primary election . . . accurately reflect the voting of the party members.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to all voters, including members of other parties, . . . raise[s] a different combination of considerations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.