Dave v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
363 F.3d 649 · 2004
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Infanzon v. Ashcroft (2004), Assaad v. Ashcroft (2004)
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reno v. Flores · LOZADA · Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft · Lozada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · MARIN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Dave's] claim that the BIA violated due process by streamlining his appeal would face a separate jurisdictional bar, one that prevents us from reviewing the merits of an IJ's discretionary decision to deny an application for cancellation of removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]ot-withstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review ... any judgment regarding the granting of relief under”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leyva v. Ashcroft“Ms. Nwaokolo's motion to reopen is part and parcel of her deportation proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.