Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 F.3d 874 - Nakamoto v. Ashcroft

Nakamoto v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

363 F.3d 874 · 2004

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Ramadan v. Gonzales (2007), Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey (2008)

21 federal appellate ·

900200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft · Kalaw v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft · Noel v. Hall · Baires v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]o court shall have jurisdiction to review . . . any decision of the Attorney General the authority for which is specified . . . to be in the discretion to the Attorney General. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Attorney General cannot legally make a judgment [about whether a petitioner's marriage was in good faith] solely according to the dictates of his or her conscience.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether a petitioner committed marriage fraud is not a decision the authority for which is specified under the INA to be entirely discretionary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.