Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 Mo. 1016 - State v. Quilling

State v. Quilling’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
4
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently November 1991 · most notably 60 Cal. 2d 631 - People v. Morse (1964), Mims v. United States (1967)

2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

18019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brinkley · Scanlon v. Kansas City · State v. Bell · Hall v. Mercantile Trust Co. · State v. Liolios

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Well, that is the penalty, whatever you assess is the penalty. Now, what happens after that, you can’t consider and go into yourselves, you just have to assess the penalty at whatever, if you have in mind assessing a penalty, whatever you are going to decide to do. Now, whatever comes of it after that is something that you are not privileged to have anything to say about or go into further.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.