Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 Mo. 998 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
6
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably State v. Raspberry (1970), State v. Newberry (1980)

109 state decisions

3801953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Best v. District of Columbia · State v. McGee · Leith v. State · State v. Guilfoyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have said, since the enactment of the above statutes [§§ 546.230; 546.240 and 547.020], especially the latter two, ... that if the separation or misconduct occurs after the retirement of the jury for deliberation and prior to reaching a verdict, defendant is entitled to a new trial even though it be established that defendant was not actually prejudiced. State v. Dodson, 338 Mo. 846 , 92 S.W.2d 614, 615 [1, 3]; State v. Shawley, 334 Mo. 352 , 67 S.W.2d 74, 88 [30]; State v. McGee, 336 Mo. 1082 , 83 S.W.2d 98, 102 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Kelly · State v. Harvey
  2. ““With the consent of the prosecuting attorney and the defendant, the court may permit the jury to separate at any adjournment or recess of the court during the trial in all cases of felony, except in capital cases; * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Murray

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.