In re N.C.H.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re JAP · In Re JT · In re J.T. (I) · In Re NCH · 189 N.C. App. 683 - In re J.A.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“service of the summons on any particular party is necessary to invoke the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re NEL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.