¶1 For the reasons stated in Section I of the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining issues.
¶2 REVERSED AND REMANDED.
363 N.C. 737
686 S.E.2d 510
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 11, 2009
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2009-12-11
<bold>Search and Seizure — frisk of defendant for weapons — reasonable</bold> <bold>suspicion</bold> <block_quote> The decision of the Court of Appeals that the trial court erred by denying defendant's motion to suppress scales and cocaine seized during a search of defendant's person is reversed for the reason stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion that, under the totality of the circumstances, officers had reasonable suspicion to frisk defendant for a weapon based upon a confidential informant's tip that defendant was involved in a recent drive-by shooting, the fact defendant was wearing gang colors, and information received from other informants and anonymous tipsters that defendant was selling drugs in the area.</block_quote>
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2010
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-12-11