Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 NW2D 747 - State v. Winchell

State v. Winchell’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably State v. Mortland (1987), State v. Mitjans (1987)

32 state decisions

220198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Back · State v. Norton · State v. Goulette · State v. Van Gorden · State v. Morales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant, by minimizing his guilt in his testimony at the time he pleads guilty, may not thereby bind the court to his version of the facts. Minn.R.Crim.P. 27.03 provides for presentence investigations and sentencing hearings. The pre-sentence investigation report should contain a summary of the relevant facts. If the defendant disputes those facts, he is free to demand a sentencing hearing to resolve the factual dispute. The fact that a defendant attempts to plead not very guilty in pleading guilty ordinarily does not limit the trial court in its findings of fact at the subsequent sentencing hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Alston · State v. Schroeder
  2. “Invasion of the victim’s zone of privacy justifies a departure because it puts the victim in constant fear for her safety whenever she is at home or in the surrounding area.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Schroeder

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.