State v. Swan’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Rochin v. People of California · Missouri v. Seibert · 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 - Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard · State v. Haynes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'whether the suspect remained in custody before making any later statements' "-the court concluded that those factors suggested that the "defendant's decision to take the breath test was the product of the immediately preceding Miranda violation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]hat information supports the trial court's inference that defendant's decision to take the test was based on a considered weighing of the benefits and disadvantages of taking the test, rather than anything she said during the DUII interview.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“in deciding whether the breath test results were admissible because defendant's decision to take the breath test broke the causal chain between the prior Article I, section 12, violation and [her] breath test results.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.