Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

363 S.C. 111

609 S.E.2d 528

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 2005

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 2005-02-10

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2015

4 state decisions

Relies on State v. Cooley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*117ANDERSON, J.,

¶1dissenting and concurring:

¶2I VOTE to REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial on involuntary manslaughter. In my judgment, a reversal is proper in regard to the charge of voluntary manslaughter, but the case must be remanded for the purpose of a new trial on involuntary manslaughter.

¶3I am convinced that a retrial of the defendant on the charge of involuntary manslaughter is proper. In State v. Cooley, 342 S.C. 63, 536 S.E.2d 666 (2000), our supreme court edified:

Furthermore, based on the testimony presented at Defendant’s trial, the result of our holding here is that without any evidence of legal provocation Defendant cannot be retried on the charge of voluntary manslaughter. Thus, retrial will be limited to the charge of involuntary manslaughter.

¶4Id. at 69, 536 S.E.2d at 669.

¶5Applying Cooley, a reversal encapsulates a retrial on involuntary manslaughter.

/363/sc/111 · .json · Public domain