Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 S.C. 192 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Ybarra v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The specific requirement that a search warrant particularly describe the person, place, or thing to be searched is aimed at preventing general warrants — those authorizing a general, exploratory rummaging in a person’s belongings. By limiting the authorization to search to the specific areas and things for which there is probable cause to search, the requirement ensures that the search will be carefully tailored to its justifications, and will not take on the character of the wide-ranging exploratory searches the Framers intended to prohibit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.