Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 S.C. 372 - Epstein v. Brown

Epstein v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. (2012), Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of Revenue (2008)

21 state decisions

200200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. United States · Shaw v. Barr · Dock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Technologies · Oscar v. University Students Cooperative Ass'n · Gregg v. Rahm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he injured party must act with some promptness where facts and circumstances of the injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his had been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is patent Dr. Epstein knew, or should have known, of a possible claim against Brown long before this Court denied certiorari in January 2001.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Dr. Epstein clearly knew, or should have known he might have had some claim against Brown at the conclusion of his trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.