State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
40 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mitchell · State v. Colf · State v. Johnson · State v. Harvey · Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To preserve an issue for review there must be a contemporaneous objection that is ruled upon by the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The impeachment value of the prior crime; (2) The point in time of the conviction and the witness's subsequent history; (3) The similarity of the past crime and the charged crime; (4) The importance of the defendant's testimony; and (5) The centrality of the credibility issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bryant“[An] objection should be addressed to the trial court in a sufficiently specific manner that brings attention to the exact error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. King
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.