Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

363 So. 2d 352

Hensley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-07-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1981

3 state decisions

Relies on 334 So. 2d 568 - Cox v. State · Division of Family Services v. In the Interest of M. V. W.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-07-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served in jail as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover it was error for the trial court to assess court costs against appellant after he had been adjudged insolvent. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976). Therefore, we reverse the order assessing costs against appellant and release appellant from any obligation to pay these costs.

¶2We remand the case to the trial court for correction of sentence. Appellant does not have to be present for this proceeding.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
/363/so2d/352 · .json · Public domain