Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 SO2D 370 - Bingham v. Manson

Bingham v. Manson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2014

11 state decisions

6019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Little v. Smeltzer · 295 So. 2d 314 - Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Com. Sh., Inc. v. State · Permenter v. Bank of Green Cove Springs · 323 So. 2d 602 - Walt Disney World Co. v. Leff · Bassett v. Talquin Elec. Coop., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellee urges that convenience of the parties or witnesses constitutes an exception to the conclud[ing] clause of [section 47.131]. We find no such exception.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the convenience of the parties or witnesses or in the interest of justice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “More explicit language could have hardly been employed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.