Largen v. Greenfield’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1980
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 89 So. 2d 24 - Kauffman v. King · 285 So. 2d 687 - Fixel v. Clevenger · 348 So. 2d 631 - Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Badia · Overseas Development, Inc. v. Krause
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The claimants argue that the defendant’s motion was prohibited by virtue of Fla.R.Med.P. 20.090(c) which provides that except for the filing of an answer there ‘shall be no other pleadings or motion filed in answer to the claim.’ We believe that this refers to motions directed to the substantive merits of the claim and does not preclude an attack on the venue of the proceeding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.