Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 So. 2d 696 - State v. Gisclair

363 So. 2d 696 - State v. Gisclair’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2001

20 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nash v. United States · 290 So. 2d 865 - City of Baton Rouge v. Norman · 310 So. 2d 89 - State v. Lindsey · 307 So. 2d 332 - State v. Heck · State v. Skinner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for services grossly inadequate for such payment or compensation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"This Court has held that the constitutional guarantee that an accused be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him requires that a penal statute describe unlawful conduct with sufficient clarity that ordinary men of reasonable intelligence are capable of discerning its meaning and conforming their conduct thereto..... We have also held that the requirement that a statute be definite has been complied with when the language `has a generally accepted meaning such that a person of ordinary intelligence would be given fair notice of what conduct is forbidden', or when `the crucial words [or] phrases in the criminal statute have a fixed and definite meaning for a person of ordinary intelligence.' ..." (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.