Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 So. 2d 699 - State v. Taylor

363 So. 2d 699 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably State v. Daniels (1993), 641 So. 2d 1081 - State v. Jackson (1994)

39 state decisions

13019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 315 So. 2d 675 - State v. Carlisle · State v. Findley · 339 So. 2d 1194 - State v. Searle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. A defendant adversely affected may move to suppress any evidence from use at the trial on the merits on the ground that it was unconstitutionally obtained. * * * * * * C. A motion filed under the provisions of this Article must be filed in accordance with Article 521, unless opportunity therefor did not exist or neither the defendant nor his counsel was aware of the existence of the evidence or the ground of the motion, or unless the failure to file the motion was otherwise excusable. The court in its discretion may permit the filing of a motion to suppress at any time before or during the trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in an area where robberies, rapes and purse-snatchings are common”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.