Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

363 S.W.3d 134

Kuta v. Kaminsky

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-01-17

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2021

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Randall Kuta, doing business as Life-tyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kamin-sky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/363/sw3d/134 · .json · Public domain