Pfeiffer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Q All right, and at some point in that time when you were doing that, were you contacted by someone else? A I received a call very shortly after I submitted his name and date of birth, I believe it was, and I received a call from Investigator Mark Perkins of Red River County. Q And what did Investigator Perkins advise you? A Mr. Perkins advised me that ... [Defense Counsel]: Object, Your Hon- or. Hearsay. Q Based on what Mr. Perkins advised you, did you have some concern? [Defense Counsel]: Object, Your Hon- or. That’s hearsay. Back door into it. Q Not for the truth. As to what his actions are. [Court]: As to what action he took, the objection will be overruled as the exception.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Lavern A. Pfeiffer v. State

2. “[t]his Court should resolve the conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning whether the State must file a notice of appeal under 44.01(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and if the State must not file a notice of appeal, remand this cause to the Court of Appeals to address the merits of the State's cross-issue.” Pfeiffer v. State, 363 S.W.3d 594 , 597 n. 3 (Tex.Crim.App.2012). 4 . Article 44.01(c) reads as follows:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Lavern A. Pfeiffer v. State