Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 363 U.S. 202 - Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States

Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

241
cited by 241 later decisions
24
cited 24 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

97 federal appellate · 12 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 241 later decisions (24 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2011 · most notably Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America v. P Lockridge (1971), United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co. (1963)

97 federal appellate · 12 district · 12 state decisions

870196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1336 · 28 U.S.C. § 1500 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284 · 28 U.S.C. § 2321

Relies on United States v. Western Pacific Railroad · Rochester Telephone Corporation v. United States · United States v. ICC · United States v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 241 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[WJhile a mere ‘abstract declaration’ on some issue by the Commission may not be judicially reviewable, an order that determines a ‘right or obligation’ so that ‘legal consequences’ will flow from it is reviewable.” 363 U.S. at 205 , 80 S.Ct. at 1133 .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “under a duty to stay its proceedings pending ... review”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.