In Re Raybon’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
November 2013
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 26 U.S.C. § 3402
Relies on Anderson v. Satterlee · In Re Edmunds · Freeman v. Schulman · In Re: David Ogle Midkiff · In Re Otero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In addition, Debtor’s receipt of a tax refund in any given year is contingent on a number of factors that may vary from year to year. For instance, Debtor estimates that her refund in the coming year will be substantially less based upon an early withdrawal from her 401(k) plan. Debtor’s refund could also vary based upon her allowable charitable contributions, changes to her pay, the payment of interest on her variable rate home loan, changes in the tax law, or numerous other events that cannot be completely and accurately predicted on the petition date. Without Debtor withholding the amount allowed by applicable law, Debtor could be liable for state and federal taxes if one of these variables change, thus jeopardizing Debtor’s ability to perform under her proposed Plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Stimac
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.